Thank you for Subscribing to Auto Business Outlook Weekly Brief
Thank you for Subscribing to Auto Business Outlook Weekly Brief
By
Auto Business Outlook | Monday, July 07, 2025
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
FREMONT, CA: As supply chain disruptions become more frequent and widespread, it's understandable that business leaders want to correct every flaw to prevent future problems. However, the idea of building a fully disruption-proof supply chain is now widely seen as unrealistic. Instead, a more practical, flexible approach has emerged as the better path forward—a mindset increasingly embraced by automakers. As industries work to strengthen their supply chains, the automotive sector’s strategic responses to recent disruptions offer valuable insights for businesses everywhere.
Key actions for CEOs to consider
Resisting the desire to centralize decision-making: As companies create increasingly intelligent systems for monitoring their supply chain and responding to disturbances, there is a natural tendency to consolidate decision-making power under a single team in charge of resilience. However, centralization might cause significant delays in responding to situations that the organization cannot afford. A more effective method is to achieve a balance between centralized and decentralized decision-making. One automotive company used a hybrid model, putting tactical or more straightforward decisions in the hands of employees working on the ground in day-to-day supply chain operations while the central supply-chain-resilience team controls larger decisions that may involve significant investments or affect the entire supply chain.
For example, the procurement team has the authority to make targeted adjustments to inventory policies, whereas the central team makes strategic decisions, such as prioritizing the list of priority risks and solutions throughout the company's supply chain. The company thinks this structure will allow it to respond more quickly to urgent situations while guaranteeing thorough diligence for changes with wider repercussions.
Providing a "good enough" product: Some automakers avoid shipment delays by modifying or deleting non-essential features and components. Their reasoning is that, following the supply challenges of the last few years, people are more willing to tolerate a product that does not provide everything they desire.
Automakers have discontinued driver assistance systems and other technologies that rely on obsolete computer processors. As the chip shortage eases, it's unclear when automakers will reverse their judgments. For example, if an analog control panel is less expensive than a digital one and clients prefer analog, is it worth switching back? Weighing customer preferences, the competitive landscape, and supplier availability can help organizations make short and long-term decisions.
I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info